First published 9/30/2026, 5:51:15 PM · Last updated 9/30/2026, 5:51:15 PM

A Qualitative Exploration of Stakeholder Experiences and Perceptions of Uganda’s Clinical Research Policies and Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic

This journal article reports qualitative research examining stakeholder experiences and perceptions of clinical research policies and guidelines in Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic. Publisher is F1000 Research Ltd and the item is a journal article published 2026-08-17.

Categories: science-and-space, public-health, politics-and-governance

Generated scores

Scores are based on the cited reporting and use a 1–10 scale. Read the methodology.

Confidence: 5/10How certain the assessment is based on the clarity and evidence in the cited reporting.
Geographic reach: 4/10How widely the event reaches, from a local area (1) to worldwide impact (10).
Global importance: 3/10The event's broader significance, from limited importance (1) to major global importance (10).
Impact magnitude: 3/10The scale or severity of the real-world impact, from minor (1) to extreme (10).
Positivity: 6/10How harmful or beneficial the event is, from strongly harmful (1) to strongly positive (10).
Urgency: 2/10How time-sensitive the event is, from low urgency (1) to immediate attention needed (10).

Why it matters

The article documents stakeholder perspectives that are relevant to understanding and evaluating Uganda’s clinical research policies during the pandemic.

Location

Sources

A Qualitative Exploration of Stakeholder Experiences and Perceptions of Uganda’s Clinical Research Policies and Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Report an issue