First published 9/29/2026, 1:30:15 AM · Last updated 9/29/2026, 1:30:15 AM

Authors' response to: Reply to Duchemin et al. identification of major congenital malformations based on healthcare databases in France: A proof‐of‐concept study using the EPI‐MERES nationwide mother–child register

Journal article (authors' response) published by Wiley on 2026-09-28 concerning identification of major congenital malformations using French healthcare databases and the EPI-MERES nationwide mother–child register. The excerpt includes only publisher and content type with no additional study details in the provided record.

Categories: science-and-space, public-health

Generated scores

Scores are based on the cited reporting and use a 1–10 scale. Read the methodology.

Confidence: 2/10How certain the assessment is based on the clarity and evidence in the cited reporting.
Geographic reach: 4/10How widely the event reaches, from a local area (1) to worldwide impact (10).
Global importance: 2/10The event's broader significance, from limited importance (1) to major global importance (10).
Impact magnitude: 1/10The scale or severity of the real-world impact, from minor (1) to extreme (10).
Positivity: 5/10How harmful or beneficial the event is, from strongly harmful (1) to strongly positive (10).
Urgency: 1/10How time-sensitive the event is, from low urgency (1) to immediate attention needed (10).

Why it matters

It relates to methods for identifying major congenital malformations using a nationwide French mother–child register.

Location

Sources

Authors' response to: Reply to Duchemin et al. identification of major congenital malformations based on healthcare databases in France: A proof‐of‐concept study using the EPI‐MERES nationwide mother–child register

Report an issue