First published 10/3/2026, 10:15:15 PM · Last updated 10/3/2026, 10:15:15 PM

Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction and Total Gastrectomy for Stage II–III Upper Gastric Cancer: A Dual-Institutional Propensity Score–Matched Analysis

A journal article reports a dual-institutional propensity score–matched comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for stage II–III cancer of the upper stomach. The supplied excerpt contains only bibliographic metadata and no additional study details.

Categories: public-health, science-and-space

Generated scores

Scores are based on the cited reporting and use a 1–10 scale. Read the methodology.

Confidence: 2/10How certain the assessment is based on the clarity and evidence in the cited reporting.
Geographic reach: 1/10How widely the event reaches, from a local area (1) to worldwide impact (10).
Global importance: 2/10The event's broader significance, from limited importance (1) to major global importance (10).
Impact magnitude: 2/10The scale or severity of the real-world impact, from minor (1) to extreme (10).
Positivity: 5/10How harmful or beneficial the event is, from strongly harmful (1) to strongly positive (10).
Urgency: 1/10How time-sensitive the event is, from low urgency (1) to immediate attention needed (10).

Why it matters

This comparative surgical study is relevant to clinical decision-making for treating stage II–III upper gastric cancer.

Sources

Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction and Total Gastrectomy for Stage II–III Upper Gastric Cancer: A Dual-Institutional Propensity Score–Matched AnalysisMetadata provided by Crossref. Usage terms

Report an issue