First published 9/29/2026, 4:47:15 PM · Last updated 9/29/2026, 4:47:15 PM

Effectiveness of digital health interventions for the management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis assessing effectiveness of digital health interventions for managing Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Published 2026-09-02 by Springer Science and Business Media LLC as a journal article.

Categories: public-health

Generated scores

Scores are based on the cited reporting and use a 1–10 scale. Read the methodology.

Confidence: 2/10How certain the assessment is based on the clarity and evidence in the cited reporting.
Geographic reach: 1/10How widely the event reaches, from a local area (1) to worldwide impact (10).
Global importance: 2/10The event's broader significance, from limited importance (1) to major global importance (10).
Impact magnitude: 3/10The scale or severity of the real-world impact, from minor (1) to extreme (10).
Positivity: 6/10How harmful or beneficial the event is, from strongly harmful (1) to strongly positive (10).
Urgency: 1/10How time-sensitive the event is, from low urgency (1) to immediate attention needed (10).

Why it matters

Synthesizes evidence on digital interventions for postoperative LARS that may inform clinical management and patient care.

Sources

Effectiveness of digital health interventions for the management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Report an issue