First published 9/29/2026, 6:19:15 AM · Last updated 9/29/2026, 6:19:30 AM

Erratum: Corrigendum to “Generative artificial intelligence in forensic science education: Student perspectives on AI-supported crime scene decision-making” [Foren. Sci. Int.: Synerg. 13, (2026), 100723]

Publisher Elsevier BV issued an erratum on 2026-12-01 correcting the article with DOI 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2026.100723 titled about generative AI in forensic science education. The source item identifies this entry as an erratum/corrigendum published by the journal publisher.

Categories: science-and-space, technology

Generated scores

Scores are based on the cited reporting and use a 1–10 scale. Read the methodology.

Confidence: 6/10How certain the assessment is based on the clarity and evidence in the cited reporting.
Geographic reach: 1/10How widely the event reaches, from a local area (1) to worldwide impact (10).
Global importance: 2/10The event's broader significance, from limited importance (1) to major global importance (10).
Impact magnitude: 2/10The scale or severity of the real-world impact, from minor (1) to extreme (10).
Positivity: 5/10How harmful or beneficial the event is, from strongly harmful (1) to strongly positive (10).
Urgency: 1/10How time-sensitive the event is, from low urgency (1) to immediate attention needed (10).

Why it matters

The erratum updates the published scholarly record for that specific forensic science education article.

Sources

Erratum: Corrigendum to “Generative artificial intelligence in forensic science education: Student perspectives on AI-supported crime scene decision-making” [Foren. Sci. Int.: Synerg. 13, (2026), 100723]

Report an issue