First published 9/29/2026, 2:22:15 AM · Last updated 9/29/2026, 2:22:15 AM

The costs policy of the European court of human rights : from judicialisation to judicial restraint

A dissertation published by Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur analyzes the European Court of Human Rights' approach to legal costs and describes a shift characterized in the title as moving from greater judicialisation toward judicial restraint. The supplied excerpt identifies the work as a dissertation but gives no further details about methods, findings, or impacts.

Categories: politics-and-governance

Generated scores

Scores are based on the cited reporting and use a 1–10 scale. Read the methodology.

Confidence: 6/10How certain the assessment is based on the clarity and evidence in the cited reporting.
Geographic reach: 1/10How widely the event reaches, from a local area (1) to worldwide impact (10).
Global importance: 2/10The event's broader significance, from limited importance (1) to major global importance (10).
Impact magnitude: 2/10The scale or severity of the real-world impact, from minor (1) to extreme (10).
Positivity: 5/10How harmful or beneficial the event is, from strongly harmful (1) to strongly positive (10).
Urgency: 1/10How time-sensitive the event is, from low urgency (1) to immediate attention needed (10).

Why it matters

The analysis may be relevant to scholars and practitioners interested in legal policy at the European Court of Human Rights.

Sources

The costs policy of the European court of human rights : from judicialisation to judicial restraint

Report an issue